[openstack-dev] Cinder Third-Party CI: what next? (was Re: [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI))

Kyle Mestery mestery at mestery.com
Tue Mar 24 22:05:50 UTC 2015

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com>

> Excerpts from Mark McClain's message of 2015-03-24 10:25:31 -0400:
> >
> > Echoing both Thierry and John.  I support Mike’s decision to enforce the
> requirement. Maintaining drivers in the tree comes with responsibilities to
> the community and 3rd party CI is one of the them.  Mike enforcing this
> requirement was the right action even if a hard one to take.
> >
> > mark
> Indeed. The deadlines were communicated clearly, and frequently.
> Making phone calls to reach out to contributors for issues like
> this is exceptional.
> +1000. Enabling contributors is great, but CI systems are an important
part of that enablement. I appreciate what Mike has done to drive Cinder
towards a quality level for all contributors here. It's a hard stance to
take, but saying "No" can sometimes be the right decision.


> Doug
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150324/9c837c07/attachment.html>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list