[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra][cinder] Could you please re-consider Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)
diem.tran at oracle.com
Mon Mar 23 22:20:49 UTC 2015
Hello Cinder team,
Oracle ZFSSA CI has been reporting since March 20th. Below is a link to
the list of results the CI already posted:
Our CI system will be running and reporting results from now on, hence I
kindly request that you accept our CI results and consider
re-integrating our drivers back in Kilo RC.
If there is any concern, please let us know.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [cinder] Could you please re-consider
Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 14:48:37 -0400
From: Alka Deshpande <Alka.Deshpande at oracle.com>
To: Mike Perez <thingee at gmail.com>
CC: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
<openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>, openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org
<openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org>, Fanyaohong <fanyaohong at huawei.com>
On 3/20/15 2:19 PM, Mike Perez wrote:
> On 12:37 Fri 20 Mar , Alka Deshpande wrote:
>> Hi MIke,
>> My team and I would like to respectfully request a revert for the
>> change at:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165939/ to bring back the
>> ZFSSA drivers to Kilo. Oracle has the CI working internally and we
>> are in the process of going through internal security review, which
>> is expected to be done by the end of March.
>> In the mean time, we have gotten permission to post test results to
>> an external webserver. We will have results reported by the end of
>> the week. If need be, we can show proof of CI running internally by
>> pasting results to pastebin:http://paste.openstack.org/show/193964/
>> We have been working diligently on setting up the CI system, and we
>> have been keeping you updated since the mid-cycle meetup in Austin.
>> We really appreciate your consideration. We do take CI setup effort
>> very seriously and striving to get it to the level of your
> The tag for Kilo in Cinder has already happened, so it's too late to revert. We
> may be able to revisit this in Kilo RC, but I want to see your CI reporting
> reliably now to then to Cinder reviews.
Thanks for the revisit consideration for Kilo RC. My team members will
be in touch with you with the
CI reporting information, shortly.
> FWIW, everyone who was removed told me they were taking it seriously too. Just
> not serious enough to have CI's reporting by the overly announced deadline.
>  -http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-January/054614.html
>  -https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers
>  -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-01-21-16.00.log.html
>  -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-04-16.04.log.html
>  -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-18-16.00.log.html
>  -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-25-16.00.log.html
>  -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-03-04-16.00.log.html
>  -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-03-18-16.00.log.html
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OpenStack-dev