Open Stack

Hello Cinder team,

Oracle ZFSSA CI has been reporting since March 20th. Below is a link to 
the list of results the CI already posted:

https://review.openstack.org/#/q/reviewer:%22Oracle+ZFSSA+CI%22,n,z

Our CI system will be running and reporting results from now on, hence I 
kindly request that you accept our CI results and consider 
re-integrating our drivers back in Kilo RC.

If there is any concern, please let us know.

Thank you,
Diem.



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Re: [OpenStack-Infra] [cinder] Could you please re-consider 
Oracle ZFS/SA Cinder drivers (iSCSI and NFS)
Date: 	Fri, 20 Mar 2015 14:48:37 -0400
From: 	Alka Deshpande <Alka.Deshpande at oracle.com>
To: 	Mike Perez <thingee at gmail.com>
CC: 	OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) 
<openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>, openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org 
<openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org>, Fanyaohong <fanyaohong at huawei.com>



On 3/20/15 2:19 PM, Mike Perez wrote:
> On 12:37 Fri 20 Mar     , Alka Deshpande wrote:
>> Hi MIke,
>>
>> My team and I would like to respectfully request a revert for the
>> change at:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165939/  to bring back the
>> ZFSSA drivers to Kilo. Oracle has the CI working internally and we
>> are in the process of going through internal security review, which
>> is expected to be done by the end of March.
>>
>> In the mean time, we have gotten permission to post test results to
>> an external webserver. We will have results reported by the end of
>> the week. If need be, we can show proof of  CI running internally by
>> pasting results to pastebin:http://paste.openstack.org/show/193964/
>>
>> We have been working diligently on setting up the CI system, and we
>> have been keeping you updated since the mid-cycle meetup in Austin.
>> We really appreciate your consideration.  We do take CI setup effort
>> very seriously and striving to get it to the level of your
>> satisfaction.
> The tag for Kilo in Cinder has already happened, so it's too late to revert. We
> may be able to revisit this in Kilo RC, but I want to see your CI reporting
> reliably now to then to Cinder reviews.
Thanks for the revisit consideration for Kilo RC. My team members will
be in touch with you with the
CI reporting information, shortly.

thanks
-Alka
>
> FWIW, everyone who was removed told me they were taking it seriously too. Just
> not serious enough to have CI's reporting by the overly announced deadline.
> [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]
>
> [1] -http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-January/054614.html
> [2] -https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers
> [3] -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-01-21-16.00.log.html
> [4] -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-04-16.04.log.html
> [5] -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-18-16.00.log.html
> [6] -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-25-16.00.log.html
> [7] -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-03-04-16.00.log.html
> [8] -http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-03-18-16.00.log.html
>


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-Infra mailing list
OpenStack-Infra at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150323/cd8ff34a/attachment-0001.html>