On 12:37 Fri 20 Mar , Alka Deshpande wrote: > Hi MIke, > > My team and I would like to respectfully request a revert for the > change at:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165939/ to bring back the > ZFSSA drivers to Kilo. Oracle has the CI working internally and we > are in the process of going through internal security review, which > is expected to be done by the end of March. > > In the mean time, we have gotten permission to post test results to > an external webserver. We will have results reported by the end of > the week. If need be, we can show proof of CI running internally by > pasting results to pastebin: http://paste.openstack.org/show/193964/ > > We have been working diligently on setting up the CI system, and we > have been keeping you updated since the mid-cycle meetup in Austin. > We really appreciate your consideration. We do take CI setup effort > very seriously and striving to get it to the level of your > satisfaction. The tag for Kilo in Cinder has already happened, so it's too late to revert. We may be able to revisit this in Kilo RC, but I want to see your CI reporting reliably now to then to Cinder reviews. FWIW, everyone who was removed told me they were taking it seriously too. Just not serious enough to have CI's reporting by the overly announced deadline. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] [1] - http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-January/054614.html [2] - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers [3] - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-01-21-16.00.log.html [4] - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-04-16.04.log.html [5] - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-18-16.00.log.html [6] - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-02-25-16.00.log.html [7] - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-03-04-16.00.log.html [8] - http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2015/cinder.2015-03-18-16.00.log.html -- Mike Perez