[openstack-dev] [oslo.config][kolla] modular backends for oslo.cfg
harlowja at outlook.com
Thu Mar 19 19:22:53 UTC 2015
And don't forget about:
Sounds pretty similar (the proxy could proxy to anything, etc.d,
zookeeper, a email system, a snail, a web-service, whatever...).
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Ben added a topic "Alternative file formats for oslo.config" for
> Liberty. this would be great if we can talk about alternative
> backends as well :)
> -- dims
>  https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-oslo-summit-planning
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah<chmouel at chmouel.com> wrote:
>> While on a long oversea flight with Sebastien Han we were talking how he had
>> implemented ceph-docker with central configuration over etcd. We quickly
>> came up to the conclusion that if we wanted to have that in Kolla it would
>> be neat if it was done straight from oslo.config so that would quickly
>> override the default keys in a central point.
>> There is multiple advantage to use that method not just for containers but
>> as well to avoid issues when orchestrating an openstack deployment.
>> I have heard arguments that this should be the job of an ansible/puppet/chef
>> tool and while I completely agree I just don't think it has to write to
>> files the tool would just write to the etcd database.
>> I have quickly came up with a quick and dirty POC on oslo.cfg here :
>> and the demo :
>> What others thinks about it ?
>> I believe if we wanted to do that we would have to add a stevesdor based
>> modular backend support directly to oslo.cfg first and have an etcd backend
>> PS: I am using etcd here cause it's easy and fancy but this could be any
>> backends like a DB/NoSQL/Swift or whatever if we wanted
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
More information about the OpenStack-dev