[openstack-dev] Deprecation warnings considered harmful?
robertc at robertcollins.net
Tue Mar 17 20:27:33 UTC 2015
On 18 March 2015 at 05:22, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at redhat.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> That relatively short-lived issue already resulted in multiple
> backports to stable branches with new namespaces being used. F.e. see:
> There is no safe way to communicate the issue to all parties involved,
> so if automation is good at catching those issues, it should be
> applied. It's wrong to rely on people when a hacking check is enough.
+1 to automation.
-1 to blocking forward progress on transient changes because our
automation hasn't been updated.
Robert Collins <rbtcollins at hp.com>
HP Converged Cloud
More information about the OpenStack-dev