[openstack-dev] [puppet] Moving under the "big tent"

Emilien Macchi emilien at redhat.com
Mon Mar 16 15:59:42 UTC 2015

On 03/16/2015 11:13 AM, Colleen Murphy wrote:
> This thread is to follow up on our IRC discussion today. In today's
> meeting we started discussing whether we want to pursue applying to move
> under the OpenStack namespace and what pros and cons are. One concern
> that was brought up was that our contributor base, being largely made up
> of operators with many responsibilities, may not remain as consistent as
> the contributors in other major projects. The counter to that was that
> being a "real" project may increase the number of contributors we get.
> Another point of discussion was which projects to move, if not all of
> them. How should we distinguish which projects are supported, and which
> are "incubated" (or deprecated)?

I think we should evaluate our modules and define together which ones
are well tested, widely-used so we can tag them "core" (ie:
puppet-nova). Otherwise I would suggest using "incubating" tag (ie:

> Please raise your concerns and discussion points here.

+1 for moving under the big tent.

> Colleen (crinkle)
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Emilien Macchi

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150316/98cf64d8/attachment.pgp>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list