[openstack-dev] Deprecation warnings considered harmful?
ihrachys at redhat.com
Thu Mar 12 20:43:18 UTC 2015
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 03/12/2015 09:35 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 13 March 2015 at 08:09, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at redhat.com>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> On 03/12/2015 11:38 AM, Boris Bobrov wrote:
>>> On Thursday 12 March 2015 12:59:10 Duncan Thomas wrote:
>>>> So, assuming that all of the oslo depreciations aren't going
>>>> to be fixed before release
>>> What makes you think that?
>>> In my opinion it's just one component's problem. These
>>> particular deprecation warnings are a result of still on-going
>>> migration from oslo.<package> to oslo_<package>. Ironically,
>>> all components except oslo have already moved to the new naming
>> It's actually wrong. For example, Trove decided to stay on using
>> the old namespace for Kilo.
starting from "2015-02-11T18:03:11". I guess the assumption was that
there is immediate benefit, and they can just wait. Though I don't
think the fact that it means deprecation warnings in their logs was
appreciated at the time of decision.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the OpenStack-dev