[openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs

Gary Kotton gkotton at vmware.com
Sat Jun 27 17:31:34 UTC 2015


+1

On 6/27/15, 1:25 PM, "Neil.Jerram at metaswitch.com"
<Neil.Jerram at metaswitch.com> wrote:

>+1 also
>
>  Original Message
>From: Fox, Kevin M
>Sent: Friday, 26 June 2015 21:15
>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Reply To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs
>
>+1
>________________________________________
>From: Tim Bell [Tim.Bell at cern.ch]
>Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 12:26 PM
>To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fungi at yuggoth.org]
>> Sent: 26 June 2015 16:42
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs
>>
>> On 2015-06-25 16:39:56 +0000 (+0000), Tim Bell wrote:
>> [...]
>> > One of the problems that I¹ve seen is with specs etiquette where
>> > people -1 because they have a question. This is a question of
>> > education rather than a fundamental issue with the process.
>>
>> http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html#peer-review
>> has been updated with a 7th entry addressing this in particular.
>> Hopefully that will help realign reviewers on acceptable vs.
>> unacceptable use of -1 for certain types of questions over time.
>
>I also feel that stackalytics should credit people of a 0 review comment
>on specs. Currently, I think that only non-zero reviews are considered as
>a contribution. My understanding of the workflow is that a 0 is in many
>cases is the constructive way to respond and therefore should be
>considered as a contribution.
>
>Tim
>
>> --
>> Jeremy Stanley
>>
>> __________________________________________________________
>> ________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-
>> request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>__________________________________________________________________________
>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>__________________________________________________________________________
>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>__________________________________________________________________________
>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list