Open Stack

+1
________________________________________
From: Tim Bell [Tim.Bell at cern.ch]
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 12:26 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fungi at yuggoth.org]
> Sent: 26 June 2015 16:42
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] The unbearable lightness of specs
>
> On 2015-06-25 16:39:56 +0000 (+0000), Tim Bell wrote:
> [...]
> > One of the problems that I’ve seen is with specs etiquette where
> > people -1 because they have a question. This is a question of
> > education rather than a fundamental issue with the process.
>
> http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html#peer-review
> has been updated with a 7th entry addressing this in particular.
> Hopefully that will help realign reviewers on acceptable vs.
> unacceptable use of -1 for certain types of questions over time.

I also feel that stackalytics should credit people of a 0 review comment on specs. Currently, I think that only non-zero reviews are considered as a contribution. My understanding of the workflow is that a 0 is in many cases is the constructive way to respond and therefore should be considered as a contribution.

Tim

> --
> Jeremy Stanley
>
> __________________________________________________________
> ________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-
> request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev