[openstack-dev] [api][nova][ironic] Microversion API HTTP header
Devananda van der Veen
devananda.vdv at gmail.com
Thu Jun 25 17:35:55 UTC 2015
Sean's point and Dmitri's are similar.
There are APIs for projects which do not have official team or "program"
names. And some teams may produce more than one forward-facing service.
Naming the API based in the team name doesn't make sense.
My previous point is that restricting the API name to the team/program name
will prevent any competition among projects. It'll be impossibly confusing
to users if more than one "monitoring" project exists, they all have
different API, but each claim to be the one true OpenStack-Monitoring-API
On Jun 25, 2015 9:37 AM, "Sean Dague" <sean at dague.net> wrote:
> On 06/25/2015 12:04 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Dmitry Tantsur <dtantsur at redhat.com
> > <mailto:dtantsur at redhat.com>> wrote:
> > I'm not sure where the assumption comes from that people will know
> > "compute" better than "nova".
> > I have been supporting developer end users on the Rackspace cloud for
> > nearly four years now. I gave a talk in Paris at the Summit about
> > supporting developers. Developers using cloud resources expect to use
> > computing power or storage capacity to accomplish a broader task. Nova
> > and swift have nothing to do with their expectations.
> That's good feedback, and clearly moves the needle in my head.
> It also does open up a question about the big tent nature, because it's
> unclear what projects that do not yet have a generic name allocated to
> them would use.
> Sean Dague
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OpenStack-dev