Open Stack

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 06/24/2015 08:38 AM, Nikola Đipanov wrote:

> I urge people to reply to this instead of my original email as the 
> writing is more detailed and balanced.

OK, I've read what others have written, and want to throw in my own
0.00008316 BTC.

The spec process is invaluable, but that is not to say that it can't be
improved - a *lot*.

Other emails have touched on the biggest disconnect in the process: that
an approved spec magically becomes unapproved on a particular calendar
date. This makes no sense whatsoever. If it was a good idea yesterday,
it will almost always be a good idea tomorrow.

The other obvious disconnect is the gap between nova-core and
nova-spec-core. If someone is knowledgeable enough and trusted enough to
commit code to Nova, they should be trusted to approve a spec.

Those two changes aren't controversial, are they? If not, let's do them
ASAP, and then iterate from there.

- -- 

- -- Ed Leafe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=UaLL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----