Open Stack

Hi Zhou,

Try Fuel 6.1 where we have a lot of very nice features including 'advanced
networking'. Feel free to read release notes [1]. It's one of the most
significant releases with many many features and improvements. I am very
proud of it.

[1] https://docs.mirantis.com/fuel/fuel-master/release-notes.html

--
Best regards,
Sergii Golovatiuk,
Skype #golserge
IRC #holser

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Zhou Zheng Sheng / 周征晟 <
zhengsheng at awcloud.com> wrote:

> Thank you guys!
>
> I'm reading the advanced networking spec and think it's good. I'll try
> to comment it. It's too epic for me for now. I wrote a patch to move
> Ceph public network to storage network. It's based on Fuel 6.0, so I'm
> trying to rebase it to lastest master then maybe ask you for a review.
>
> on 2015/06/23 19:21, Igor Kalnitsky wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > That makes sense to me. Still, I want to point that we're going to
> > implement advanced networking and with this feature you'll be able to
> > assign every single network role to any network.
> >
> > That means, you'll be able to assign ceph network role to storage,
> > management or  whatever-you-want network. Sounds cool, ha? :)
> >
> > Feel free to read a design spec [1].
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Igor
> >
> > [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115340/
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Zhou Zheng Sheng / 周征晟
> > <zhengsheng at awcloud.com> wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I notice that in OpenStack deployed by Fuel, Ceph public network is on
> >> management network. In some environments, not all NICs of a physical
> >> server are 10Gb. Sometimes 1 or 2 among the NICs on a machine may be
> >> 1Gb. Usually on this type of machine we assign management network to 1Gb
> >> NIC, and storage network to 10Gb NIC. If Ceph public network is with
> >> management network, the QEMU accesses Ceph using management network, and
> >> the performance is not optimal.
> >>
> >> In a small deployment, cloud controller and Ceph OSD may be assigned to
> >> the same machine, so it would be more effective to keep Ceph client
> >> traffic separated from MySQL, RabbitMQ, Pacemaker traffic. Maybe it's
> >> better to place Ceph public network on the storage network. Agree?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best wishes!
> >> Zhou Zheng Sheng, Software Developer
> >> Beijing AWcloud Software Co., Ltd.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >> Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> --
> Best wishes!
> Zhou Zheng Sheng / 周征晟  Software Developer
> Beijing AWcloud Software Co., Ltd.
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150624/964ebbe0/attachment.html>