[openstack-dev] [ClusterLabs] [HA] RFC: moving Pacemaker openstack-resource-agents to stackforge

Adam Spiers aspiers at suse.com
Wed Jun 24 00:17:58 UTC 2015


Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote:
> <Resending to the Cluster Labs mailing list, this list is deprecated>

Thanks, I only realised that after getting a deprecation warning :-(

> On 23/06/15 06:27 AM, Adam Spiers wrote:
> > [cross-posting to openstack-dev and pacemaker lists; please consider
> > trimming the recipients list if your reply is not relevant to both
> > communities]
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > https://github.com/madkiss/openstack-resource-agents/ is a nice
> > repository of Pacemaker High Availability resource agents (RAs) for
> > OpenStack, usage of which has been officially recommended in the
> > OpenStack High Availability guide.  Here is one of several examples:
> > 
> >     http://docs.openstack.org/high-availability-guide/content/_add_openstack_identity_resource_to_pacemaker.html
> > 
> > Martin Loschwitz, who owns this repository, has since moved away from
> > OpenStack, and no longer maintains it.  I recently proposed moving the
> > repository to StackForge, and he gave his consent and in fact said
> > that he had the same intention but hadn't got round to it:
> > 
> >     https://github.com/madkiss/openstack-resource-agents/issues/22#issuecomment-113386505
> > 
> > You can see from that same github issue that several key members of
> > the OpenStack Pacemaker sub-community are all in favour.  Therefore
> > I am volunteering to do the move to StackForge.
> 
> There is a "CusterLabs" group on github that most of the HA cluster
> projects have or are moving under. Why not use that?

This question was asked and answered in the github issue:

https://github.com/madkiss/openstack-resource-agents/issues/22#issuecomment-114147300

Cheers,
Adam



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list