Open Stack

On 06/12/2015 12:34 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 06/10/2015 11:23 PM, Mike Bayer wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/10/15 5:18 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> On 06/10/2015 04:52 PM, Mike Bayer wrote:
>>>> whew!  :)
>>> Do you know why it fails with Kilo?
>>>
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/190062/
>>
>> I noticed this, I don't know very well how the requirements get
>> distributed around but seems like it is not happening here:
>>
>> http://logs.openstack.org/62/190062/2/check/check-grenade-dsvm/d4597a4/logs/grenade.sh.txt.gz
>>
>> pkg_resources.ContextualVersionConflict: (SQLAlchemy 1.0.5 (/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages), Requirement.parse('SQLAlchemy<=0.9.99,>=0.9.7'), set(['oslo.db']))
> 
> Yeah, so we are bitten by over-restricting requirements in oslo.db.
> Nothing which can't be fixed, IMO.
> 
> Would it be ok to first fix oslo.db, and then unrestrict in
> global-requirements.txt? Is this the way to go?
> 
> I really would love to see this fixed in the Kilo branch, because no
> mater what, SQLAlchemy 1.0.x will be uploaded to Sid, and I'd prefer
> that it doesn't just break hard Kilo which is there...
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)

FYI:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/190848/

(I don't have the CI result as of writing...)

Thomas