Open Stack

On 06/10/2015 04:52 PM, Mike Bayer wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/10/15 3:26 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your quick reply which is very useful to me.
>>
>> On 06/09/2015 07:08 PM, Mike Bayer wrote:
>>> On 6/9/15 9:26 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The python-sqlalchemy package has been uploaded to Debian Experimental,
>>>> and is about to be uploaded to Debian Unstable. So I wonder what's the
>>>> state of the project regarding upgrading SQLA.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe Mike can tell what kind of issue we may run into? How much work
>>>> will it be to switch to SQLA 1.0.x for Liberty? Is it possible to be
>>>> compatible with both 9.x and 1.x (which would be the best way forward)?
>>> The short answer is that there are no supported use cases that have been
>>> intentionally changed in any backwards incompatible way in 1.0 and all
>>> Openstack code should be able to accommodate from 0.9.x -> 1.0.x without
>>> any change.
>> Ah, super cool!
>>
>> I saw that this passed all tests:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189847/
> 
> whew!  :)

Do you know why it fails with Kilo?

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/190062/

Thomas