Open Stack

On 6/10/15 3:26 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks a lot for your quick reply which is very useful to me.
>
> On 06/09/2015 07:08 PM, Mike Bayer wrote:
>> On 6/9/15 9:26 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The python-sqlalchemy package has been uploaded to Debian Experimental,
>>> and is about to be uploaded to Debian Unstable. So I wonder what's the
>>> state of the project regarding upgrading SQLA.
>>>
>>> Maybe Mike can tell what kind of issue we may run into? How much work
>>> will it be to switch to SQLA 1.0.x for Liberty? Is it possible to be
>>> compatible with both 9.x and 1.x (which would be the best way forward)?
>> The short answer is that there are no supported use cases that have been
>> intentionally changed in any backwards incompatible way in 1.0 and all
>> Openstack code should be able to accommodate from 0.9.x -> 1.0.x without
>> any change.
> Ah, super cool!
>
> I saw that this passed all tests:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189847/

whew!  :)


>
> Could we get it approved?
>
> Mike
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev