Open Stack

Hi, Dmitry,

I guess the whole idea of new release models is NOT to tie projects to each
> other any more except for The Big Release twice a year :) So I think no, we
> don't need to. We still can do it, if we have something to release by the
> time Ironic releases, but I suggest deciding it on case-by-case basis.

OK, I see.

One more concern, about Tempest integration test which I will implement in
V2.1.0,
it seems like that we cannot add Ironic-inspector's tests into Tempest even
if integration tests.
Please see:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-QA-in-the-big-tent

But I heard from you that Devananda thinks we need this in tempest itself.
[3]
Do you know something like current situation?


Best Regards,
Yuiko Takada

2015-06-09 15:59 GMT+09:00 Dmitry Tantsur <dtantsur at redhat.com>:

> On 06/09/2015 03:49 AM, Yuiko Takada wrote:
>
>> Hi, Dmitry,
>>
>> Thank you for notifying.
>>
>>     I've updated our summit etherpad [3] with whatever priorities I
>>     remembered, please have a look. I've also untargeted a few things in
>>     launchpad [4] (and will probably untarget more later on). Please
>>     assign yourself, if you want something done in this release time
>> frame.
>>
>> I've assigned one item to myself in [3], and also I added one BP to [4],
>> so please take a look.
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ironic-inspector/+spec/delete-db-api
>>
>
> Looks good, though I don't think it's a big priority for 2.0.0. Definitely
> worth doing for 2.1.0.
>
> Thanks for assigning for tempest work, that's definitely a priority right
> now.
>
>
>> BTW, how do you think about Ironic-inspector's release model?
>> You wrote "Version released with Ironic Liberty" as
>> Ironic-inspector Version 2.1.0 in etherpad [3],
>> but as you know, Ironic's release model has changed to feature
>> releases.(right?)
>> Should we make our release model same as Ironic?
>>
>
> I guess the whole idea of new release models is NOT to tie projects to
> each other any more except for The Big Release twice a year :) So I think
> no, we don't need to. We still can do it, if we have something to release
> by the time Ironic releases, but I suggest deciding it on case-by-case
> basis.
>
>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Yuiko Takada(Inspector team member)
>>
>> 2015-06-08 20:38 GMT+09:00 Dmitry Tantsur <dtantsur at redhat.com
>> <mailto:dtantsur at redhat.com>>:
>>
>>
>>     Hello, Inspector team!
>>
>>     The renaming process is going pretty well, the last thing we need to
>>     do is to get Infra approval and actual rename [1][2].
>>
>>     I'd like to allow people (e.g. myself) to start packaging inspector
>>     under it's new name, so I'd like to make 2.0.0 release as soon as
>>     possible (as opposed to scheduling it to particular date). All
>>     breaking changes should land by this release - I don't expect 3.0.0
>>     soon :)
>>
>>     I've updated our summit etherpad [3] with whatever priorities I
>>     remembered, please have a look. I've also untargeted a few things in
>>     launchpad [4] (and will probably untarget more later on). Please
>>     assign yourself, if you want something done in this release time
>> frame.
>>
>>     I would like 2.1.0 to be released with Ironic Liberty and be
>>     properly supported.
>>
>>     Let me know what you think.
>>
>>     Cheers,
>>     Dmitry
>>
>>     [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188030/
>>     [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/188798/
>>     [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-ironic-discoverd
>>     [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic-inspector/+milestone/2.0.0
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>     Unsubscribe:
>>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> >
>>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150610/5f76a3f0/attachment.html>