Open Stack

Doug,


I understand that you feel that the negative response to your
> proposal was strong, but this is *COMPLETELY* inappropriate wording
> for this mailing list.


Okay, next time I will copy paste parts of emails from others
(with the even more offensive tone in my side)
Instead of making such list.


Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Doug Hellmann <doug at doughellmann.com> wrote:

> Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2015-06-05 20:03:44 +0300:
> > Hi stackers,
> >
> > Seems likes after stackforge/rally -> openstack/rally Rally project
> started
> > being more attractive.
> > According recent stats we are on top 3 position (based on Patch sets
> stats)
> > http://stackalytics.com/?release=liberty&metric=patches&project_type=All
> > And if we compare half year ago we have 40 open reviews and now we have
> > about 140...
> > In other words we need to scale core reviewing process with keeping
> > quality.
> >
> > <history_note>
> >
> > I suggested in mailing thread:
> > [openstack-dev][all][infra][tc][ptl] Scaling up code review process
> (subdir
> > cores)
> > To create special rules & ACL groups to have fully automated system.
> >
> > Instead of support I got raped by community.
>
> I understand that you feel that the negative response to your
> proposal was strong, but this is *COMPLETELY* inappropriate wording
> for this mailing list.
>
> Doug
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150605/d8bb124b/attachment.html>