https://www.rabbitmq.com/ha.html Both? I think ha_all/HA is just the policy name and so it can be whatever you want. -Alex On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Alvise Dorigo <alvise.dorigo at pd.infn.it> wrote: > Hi, > I read these two documents: > > > http://docs.openstack.org/high-availability-guide/content/_configure_rabbitmq.html > > https://www.rdoproject.org/RabbitMQ > > To configure the queues in HA mode, the two docs suggests two slightly > different commands; > > The first one says: > > rabbitmqctl set_policy ha-all '^(?!amq\.).*' '{"ha-mode": "all"}' > > > while the second one says: > > rabbitmqctl set_policy HA '^(?!amq\.).*' '{"ha-mode": "all"}' > > > "ha_all" vs. "HA". > > which one is correct ? > > thanks, > > Alvise > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150728/289e7c14/attachment.html>