Open Stack

Hi,

I have checked the code. After fixing tests, this patch maybe included to
FFE as it has minimal impact on core functionality. +1 for FFE for
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196114/

--
Best regards,
Sergii Golovatiuk,
Skype #golserge
IRC #holser

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Vladimir Kuklin <vkuklin at mirantis.com>
wrote:

> There is a slight change needed, e.g. fixing of noop tests. Then we can
> merge it and accept for FFE, I think.
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Andrian Noga <anoga at mirantis.com> wrote:
>
>> Colleagues,
>> actually, i'm tottaly agree with Mike. We can merge
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196114/ w/o additional Ceilometer
>> support (will be moved to next release). So if we merge it today we dont
>> need FFE for this feature.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Andrian
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Mike Scherbakov <
>> mscherbakov at mirantis.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Since we are in FF state already, I'd like to have urgent estimate from
>>> one of fuel-library cores:
>>> - holser
>>> - alex_didenko
>>> - aglarendil
>>> - bogdando
>>>
>>> aglarendil is on vacation though. Guys, please take a look at
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196114/ - can we accept it as
>>> exception? Seems to be good to go...
>>>
>>> I still think that additional Ceilometer support should be moved to the
>>> next release.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:56 PM Mike Scherbakov <
>>> mscherbakov at mirantis.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Andrian,
>>>> this is High priority blueprint [1] for 7.0 timeframe. It seems we
>>>> still didn't merge the main part [2], and need FF exception for additional
>>>> stuff.
>>>>
>>>> The question is about quality. If we focus on enhancements, then we
>>>> don't focus on bugs. Which whether means to deliver work with lower quality
>>>> of slip the release.
>>>>
>>>> My opinion is rather don't give FF exception in this case, and don't
>>>> have Ceilometer support for this new feature.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/compute-vmware-role
>>>> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196114/
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:39 PM Andrian Noga <anoga at mirantis.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> The patch patch for fuel-library
>>>>> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196114/>  that implements
>>>>> 'compute-vwmare' role (https://mirantis.jira.com/browse/PROD-627) requires
>>>>> additional work to do (ceilometer support.), but as far as I can see it
>>>>> doesn't affect any other parts of the product.
>>>>>
>>>>> We plan to implement it in 3 working days (2 for implementation, 1
>>>>> day for writing system test and test runs), it should not be hard since we
>>>>> already support ceilometer compute agent deployment on controller
>>>>> nodes.
>>>>>
>>>>> We need 1 DevOps engineer and 1 QA engineer to be engaged for this
>>>>> work.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I think it's ok to accept this feature as an exception for feature
>>>>> freeze.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Andrian Noga
>>>>> Project manager
>>>>> Partner Centric Engineering
>>>>> Mirantis, Inc
>>>>>
>>>>> Mob.phone: +38 (063) 966-21-24
>>>>>
>>>>> Email: anoga at mirantis.com
>>>>> Skype: bigfoot_ua
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mike Scherbakov
>>>> #mihgen
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Mike Scherbakov
>>> #mihgen
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Andrian
>> Mirantis, Inc
>>
>> Mob.phone: +38 (063) 966-21-24
>> Email: anoga at mirantis.com
>> Skype: bigfoot_ua
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Yours Faithfully,
> Vladimir Kuklin,
> Fuel Library Tech Lead,
> Mirantis, Inc.
> +7 (495) 640-49-04
> +7 (926) 702-39-68
> Skype kuklinvv
> 35bk3, Vorontsovskaya Str.
> Moscow, Russia,
> www.mirantis.com <http://www.mirantis.ru/>
> www.mirantis.ru
> vkuklin at mirantis.com
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150727/35121b45/attachment.html>