Open Stack

Greetings,

The issue [1] looks like a feature to me. I'd move it to next release.
Let's focus on what's important right now - stability.

Thanks,
Igor

[1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1476779

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Evgeniy L <eli at mirantis.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since the feature is essential, and changes are small, we can accept it as
> a,
> feature freeze exceptions.
>
> But as far as I know there is a very important ticket [1] which was created
> in
> order to get patches merged faster, also I still have concerns regarding to
> ERB style template "<% if3 %>" which is in fact Jinja. So it's not only
> about
> fixes in the client.
>
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1476779
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Mike Scherbakov <mscherbakov at mirantis.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Looks like the only CLI part left:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/204321/, and you guys did a great job
>> finishing the other two.
>>
>> Looks like we'd need to give FF exception, as this is essential feature.
>> It's glad that we merged all other thousands lines of code. This is the most
>> complex feature, and seems like the only small thing is left.
>>
>> I'd like to hear feedback from Nailgun cores & fuel client SMEs. For me,
>> it seems it is lower risk, and patch is relatively small. How long would it
>> take to complete it? If it takes a couple of days, then it is fine. If it is
>> going to take week or two, then we will have to have it as a risk for HCF
>> deadline. Spending resources on features now, not on bugs, means less
>> quality or slip of the release.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 2:36 PM Aleksey Kasatkin <akasatkin at mirantis.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Team,
>>>
>>> I would like to request an exception from the Feature Freeze for
>>> "Templates for Networking" feature [1].
>>>
>>> Exception is required for two CRs to python-fuelclient: [2],[3] and one
>>> CR to fuel-web (Nailgun): [4].
>>> These CRs are for adding ability to create/remove networks via API [4]
>>> and for supporting new API functionality via CLI.
>>> These patchsets are for adding new templates-related functionality and
>>> they do not change existing functionality.
>>> Patchsets [3],[4] are in deep review and they will hopefully be merged on
>>> Thursday.
>>>
>>> Please, respond if you have any questions or concerns related to this
>>> request.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/templates-for-networking
>>> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/204321/
>>> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203602/
>>> [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/201217/
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Aleksey Kasatkin
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>> --
>> Mike Scherbakov
>> #mihgen
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>