Open Stack

"Daneyon Hansen (danehans)" <danehans at cisco.com> wrote on 07/23/2015
03:40:38 PM:

> From: "Daneyon Hansen (danehans)" <danehans at cisco.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>, Mohammad Banikazemi/Watson/
> IBM at IBMUS, "Steven Dake (stdake)" <stdake at cisco.com>
> Cc: Eran Gampel <Eran.Gampel at toganetworks.com>, Irena Berezovsky
> <irena at midokura.com>
> Date: 07/23/2015 03:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr][kolla] - Bringing
> Dockers networking to Neutron
>
> From: Antoni Segura Puimedon <toni+openstackml at midokura.com>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Date: Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 11:16 AM
> To: Mohammad Banikazemi <mb at us.ibm.com>, "Steven Dake (stdake)" <
> stdake at cisco.com>
> Cc: Eran Gampel <Eran.Gampel at toganetworks.com>, "OpenStack
> Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-
> dev at lists.openstack.org>, Irena Berezovsky <irena at midokura.com>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr][kolla] - Bringing
> Dockers networking to Neutron
>
> Why is a separate OpenStack project needed to contribute to
> libnetwork? I would think the Neutron community would follow the
> libnetwork contrib guidelines and submit the code.
>

While there may be contributions to docker/libnetwork at some point, the
project is not about contributing to libnetwork. For example, the Neutron
driver itself won't be part of the docker or libnetwork tree. Making other
OpenStack and Neutron services available for use by containers may be a
good reason  for having it under the OpenStack and Neutron umbrella but I
think one can debate where a project fits best.

Best,

Mohammad
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150723/ef7dcae5/attachment.html>