Open Stack

Hi guys,

@Sergii, it looks like you misunderstood something. `node-uuid` is not
a general use case. It's only about conflicting nodes, and I'm sure
everyone's going to change such a hostname in order to avoid
confusion.

@Andrew,

a) Database refuses hostnames that break unique constraint, sot it'll
work out-of-box.

b) I like this idea. I think refusing `node-id` where `id` is not
actually a node id is good idea. It solves our problem.

Thanks,
Igor

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Sergii Golovatiuk
<sgolovatiuk at mirantis.com> wrote:
> node-uuid is very terrible from UX perspective of view. Ask support people
> if they are comfortable to ssh such nodes or telling the name in phone
> conversation with customer. If we cannot validate FQDN of hostname I would
> slip this feature to next release where we can pay more attention to
> details.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Sergii Golovatiuk,
> Skype #golserge
> IRC #holser
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>