Open Stack

correction: I think that discussing who should be in what group at next
week's meeting make sense. Susanne

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Susanne Balle <sleipnir012 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> cool! thanks. I will request to be added to the correct groups.
>
> Susanne
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Hayes, Graham <graham.hayes at hp.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have created a github org and 2 repos for us to get started in.
>>
>> https://github.com/gslb/ is the org, with https://github.com/gslb/gslb
>> as the main code repo.
>>
>> There is 2 "teams" (Github's name for groups) gslb-core, and gslb-admin.
>>
>> Core have read/write access to the repos, and admin can add / remove
>> projects.
>>
>> I also created https://github.com/gslb/gslb-specs which will
>> automatically publish to https://gslb-specs.readthedocs.org
>>
>> There is also a launchpad project https://launchpad.net/gslb with 2
>> teams:
>>
>> gslb-drivers - people who can target bugs / bps
>> gslb-core - the maintainers of the project
>>
>> All the info is on the wiki: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GSLB
>>
>> So, next question - who should be in what groups? I am open to
>> suggestions... should it be an item for discussion next week?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Graham
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150721/af80f66b/attachment.html>