Open Stack

On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 07/15/2015 03:27 PM, John Griffith wrote:
>
>> It's relatively limited right now I think, and part of the reason for
>> that is we've tried to ensure that the information that we put on tags
>> is subjective
>>
>
> I think you mean "objective" here, and throughout this, not "subjective".
> We try as much as possible for the tag definitions to have a clear list of
> requirements -- preferably driven by some data source like a script that
> queries stackalytics -- that can be used in applying the tag to a project.


​GAAHHHHH... YES, you're correct!!!  I did mean "objective", sorry that was
terrible.​


>
>
> >, and at the same time doesn't give any false impression
>
>> that something is "good" or "bad".  We just wanted to have tags to
>> easily convey some general information about a project to help people
>> gain at least a little insight into a project, how it's managed, what
>> sort of community is contributing to it etc.
>>
>> As we move into things like the "compute starter kit" it gets a bit less
>> subjective, but not really too much.
>
>
> It got a bit *more* subjective, not less subjective :) Or perhaps you
> meant "prescriptive"?
>
​Yes, thank you!  That's awfully embarrassing.​

​  ​


>
> Best,
> -jay
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150720/bc2b5074/attachment-0001.html>