@Elena, What are the pro's and con's of "having a handler" as this was the existing behavior for all the projects that picked up code from oslo-incubator for this behavior? -- dims On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Elena Ezhova <eezhova at mirantis.com> wrote: > Hi! > > Not so long ago oslo.service had a handler for SIGINT and on receiving this > signal a process killed all children with SIGTERM and exited. > Change [1], that added graceful shutdown on SIGTERM, removed all SIGINT > handlers and currently all services that consume oslo.service generate > KeyboardInterrupt exceptions on receiving SIGINT. > > My question is whether such behavior is what users and operators expect or > having a handler is still the preferred way? > > > Thanks, Elena > > [1] > https://github.com/openstack/oslo.service/commit/fa9aa6b665f75e610f2b91a7d310f6499bd71770 > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims