Open Stack

Matt does add value, and I definitely don't want to imply that what he does
isn't great work or that it isn't helpful to the project, however its hard
to +1 a Core reviewer who has 1 review in the liberty timeframe. Since one
of the primary purposes of core reviewers is to actively review code it
doesn't make much sense to me.

If Matt becomes more active performing quality reviews then I have no
qualms.

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Kevin Carter <kevin.carter at rackspace.com>
wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> I would like to nominate Matt Kassawara (IRC: sam-i-am) to the OpenStack
> Ansible deployment core team. Matt has been instrumental in building out
> our current install and use documentation[0], he is just about always in
> the community channel(s) helping folks, is a great technical resource for
> all things networking / OpenStack, and is one of the main people we already
> rely on to ensure we're documenting the right things in the right places.
> IMHO, its about time he be given Core powers within the OSAD project.
>
> Please respond with +1/-1s and or any other concerns.
>
> As a reminder, we are using the voting process outlined at [
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/Approved/CoreDevProcess ] to
> add members to our core team.
>
> --
>
> Kevin Carter
> IRC: cloudnull
>
> [0]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:%22Matthew+Kassawara%22+status:merged+project:stackforge/os-ansible-deployment,n,z
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150717/bd192625/attachment.html>