Open Stack

Sean, I agreed with you. But after I read Yan's user case. I think the
FWaaS API may become too complex for that case.

By extending security group is better option.


On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Sean M. Collins <sean at coreitpro.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 03:31:49AM PDT, Kevin Benton wrote:
> > Unfortunately the security groups API does not have mac-level rules right
> > now.
>
> There is also the fact that the Security Group API is limited (by
> design) to do fairly simple things, and also that the model has similar
> fields to the AWS API for Security Groups.
>
> Overall, I want to try and minimize (or even avoid) any changes to the
> Security Group API, and try and collect usecases for more complex
> filtering to see if the FwaaS API can satisfy - since it is an API that
> we have more freedom to change and modify compared to an API that is
> named the same as something in AWS - and it is meant for more complex
> usecases.
>
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-June/068319.html
> --
> Sean M. Collins
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150716/1a585769/attachment.html>