Open Stack

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 07/15/2015 09:49 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:

> Without reading the whole thread, couldn't you just do a feature
> branch (but that would require reviews in gerrit which we don't
> want), or fork the repo in github and just hack on it there without
> gerrit?
> 
> I'm sure many will say it's not cool to fork the repo, but that's 
> essentially what you'd be doing anyway, so meh.

It will be a temporary fork, not anything designed to live on forever.

> I think you just have to have an understanding that whatever you
> work on in the fork won't necessarily be accepted back in the main
> repo.

Yes, that's sort of the whole point. First prove that it can work;
then and only then do we sit down and discuss the best way to
implement. The odds that any of the changes made would be able to be
pulled directly into master would be slim.

- -- 

- -- Ed Leafe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=5/gA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----