[openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty SFE Request - Dynamic Policies

Henry Nash henrynash9 at mac.com
Mon Jul 13 21:26:37 UTC 2015


So although I am in favor of approving some of this, it isn’t quite clear what portions of “Dynamic Policy” is being asked for an exception?  We need to be clear exactly what bps we are taking about here, since there is a lot under that umbrella.

Henry
> On 13 Jul 2015, at 19:20, Yee, Guang <guang.yee at hp.com <mailto:guang.yee at hp.com>> wrote:
> 
> ++!
>  
> Per my understanding, the work, and therefore the risks, are fairly compartmentalized. The upside is this will pave the way for a much richer authorization management system. 
>  
>  
> Guang
>  
> From: Adam Young [mailto:ayoung at redhat.com <mailto:ayoung at redhat.com>] 
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 10:15 AM
> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org <mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty SFE Request - Dynamic Policies
>  
> On 07/03/2015 08:36 AM, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
> 
> Thanks for clarifying. A Spec Freeze Exception is what I was supposed to ask for.
> 
> Rectifying:
> 
> On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject, I would like to ask for a *Spec Freeze Exception* in Liberty for it.
> 
> This one is an important lead in to a lot of other work. Getting just this in to Liberty allows us to focus the remainder of the work on Dynamic policy inside Keystone.
> 
> Please approve.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz
> 
> 
> Thierry Carrez wrote:
> samuel wrote:
> [...]
> On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject, I would
> like to ask for a Feature Freeze Exception in Liberty for it.
> Liberty Feature Freeze is on September 3rd, so I doubt you need a
> feature freeze exception at this time. I suspect that would be a spec
> freeze exception or some other Keystone-specific freeze exception ?
>  
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/FeatureFreeze <https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/FeatureFreeze>
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe <mailto:OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
>  
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org <mailto:OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150713/7cf5cd4e/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list