Open Stack

Hi Mike,

Unfortunately, we don't get a lot of stats [1] because we don't run it
often. I've added 'check experimental' comment to latest
python-cinderclient review request to get more stats.

Review request to make this voting: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200522/

[1]
http://graphite.openstack.org/render/?width=877&height=548&_salt=1436533755.887&from=00%3A00_20150524&until=23%3A59_20150710&target=stats.zuul.pipeline.experimental.job.check-cinderclient-dsvm-functional.FAILURE&target=stats.zuul.pipeline.experimental.job.check-cinderclient-dsvm-functional.SUCCESS&target=stats.zuul.pipeline.experimental.openstack.python-cinderclient.total_changes&title=check-cinderclient-dsvm-functional

Regards,
Ivan Kolodyazhny,
Web Developer,
http://blog.e0ne.info/,
http://notacash.com/,
http://kharkivpy.org.ua/

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:14 PM, Mike Perez <thingee at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 21:48 Jul 06, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > Aslo, what do you think about moving cinderclient functional tests from
> > experimental to non-voting queue to make it more public and run it with
> > every patch to python-cinderclient?
>
> I'm fine with this as long as the job has been stable since it was
> introduced
> as experimental. You mind posting the stats?
>
> --
> Mike Perez
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150710/c881b5b6/attachment.html>