Open Stack

+1 for enabling auto-abandon

Sergii, I think the period should be smaller, 2 weeks - 1 month,
if patch is important, the author will unabandon it.

Thanks,

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Sergii Golovatiuk <sgolovatiuk at mirantis.com>
wrote:

> 3 Months should be a good period. Sometimes, people have one month
> vacation thus it might be a problem in such cases.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Sergii Golovatiuk,
> Skype #golserge
> IRC #holser
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Mike Scherbakov <mscherbakov at mirantis.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> we have too many patches which hang for over a month without attention.
>> Almost all are those which should be abandoned due to changes happened in
>> master, and need complete rework. Or, those were just proposals to make
>> something, which didn't fly. Unfortunately there are those which were good
>> ideas, but didn't attract enough attention from cores and didn't land into
>> master as a result.
>>
>> Anyway, I think we need to keep our review queues in better health. Can
>> we enable auto-abandon back again, if patch is hanging out for a month or
>> more?
>> --
>> Mike Scherbakov
>> #mihgen
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150708/a7faccf1/attachment.html>