Open Stack

After some consultation with Doug and Thierry, we've boiled the change I'm
recommending below down to two options:

1. independent, ad-hoc backport branches, tag yourself
2. cycle-with-intermediary, stable branches, tag by RelMgt team

I think what we really want is option #1 for these projects. I'd like all
of them to be the same here, so if people are thinking differently, please
reply on this thread. I'll update the patches to reflect the fact we'll be
in charge of the ad-hoc branches and tags in the Neutron Stadium.

Thanks!
Kyle


On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Kyle Mestery <mestery at mestery.com> wrote:

> The tl;dr for this email is that the patch referenced here [1] is moving
> release management tasks for the networking-foo projects into alignment
> with other Neutron libraries. There is value in having this consolidated
> into a single place.
>
> The longer version is that as plugin backends and new libraries have
> integrated into the Neutron Stadium, it makes sense to align some release
> items here. For example, merge commits, tags, and stable branch management
> aspects are things which are best done by a central team for all
> networking-foo projects (along with existing projects). In particular,
> stable releases have some specific requirements [2] which need to be met as
> stable releases are done here. Ensuring this is following existing
> processes is part of the reason for this gerrit ACL change.
>
> Please comment on the reviews if you have concerns as a networking-foo
> owner.
>
> Thanks!
> Kyle
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/198749/
> [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranch
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150707/b738594e/attachment.html>