[openstack-dev] Barbican : Regarding the Tempest Tests for Barbican

Asha Seshagiri asha.seshagiri at gmail.com
Fri Jul 3 20:42:53 UTC 2015


Thanks Mathew for providing the updated information :)

Thanks and Regards,
Asha Seshagiri

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Matthew Treinish <mtreinish at kortar.org>
wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 03:30:55PM -0500, Douglas Mendiz?bal wrote:
>
> > Hi Asha,
> >
> > The blueprint you linked for Tempest is over a year old.  I think it
> > pre-dates the Tempest team's decision to stop putting all project
> > tests in the same repo.  I believe the spec is obsolete, but someone
> > from the Tempest team can correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> Yes, that blueprint was quite old and if you look at the history for it
> there
> was nary a patch submitted against it. So, I guess whoever was planning to
> do
> that work never got around to it. The reason the BP was sitting around for
> so
> long is mostly because I'm terrible at the lp maintenance. I apologize for
> any
> confusion that caused. I took some time this afternoon to go through open
> blueprints and specs repo to clean things up. I marked this particular BP
> as
> obsolete now to reflect it's actual state.
>
> You're correct in your assertion that we will be moving to a limited set of
> projects for which tests are maintained in the tempest tree. The plan is
> to have
> everything else that wants to use tempest for testing but doesn't fit into
> that
> set of projects leverage tempest-lib and the plugin interface which is
> currently
> in progress. However, until all the pieces are in place, including docs to
> explain this all, we're not blocking additions for projects that are
> currently
> in-tree but outside that set. (which does not include barbican because
> nothing
> was ever added)
>
> -Matt Treinish
>
> >
> > The automated tests that validate the API are the Functional Tests I
> > linked in my earlier email.
> >
> > - - Douglas Mendiz?bal
> >
> > On 7/1/15 3:22 PM, Asha Seshagiri wrote:
> > > Hi Douglas ,
> > >
> > > Are there any Automated Test cases created for validating the
> > > Barbican APIs.
> > >
> > > Thanks and Regards, Asha Seshagiri
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Asha Seshagiri
> > > <asha.seshagiri at gmail.com <mailto:asha.seshagiri at gmail.com>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Douglas for your response and appreciate for pointing me to
> > > the right link
> > >
> > > I was talking about the tempest tests to validate the Barbican
> > > APIs Please find the spec[1] and blue print link [2] for the same
> > > .
> > >
> > > [1]http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/qa-specs/specs/barbican-api-te
> > sts.html
> > >
> > >
> > [2]https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/add-basic-tests-for-ba
> > rbican
> > >
> > > Are above specs and blueprint have become void for Barbican? Now I
> > > could use the  link sent by you for validating the APIs
> > >
> > > Thanks and Regards, Asha Seshagiri
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Douglas Mendiz?bal
> > > <douglas.mendizabal at rackspace.com
> > > <mailto:douglas.mendizabal at rackspace.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Asha,
> > >
> > > I'm not sure what you mean by "tempest tests."  If you're looking
> > > for Functional Tests for Barbican, then you can find them in the
> > > functionaltests directory [1] inside the Barbican repo.
> > >
> > > We have no intentions of adding Barbican specific tests to the
> > > Tempest repo.  It's my understanding that Tempest is moving away
> > > from one monolithic repository into a modular approach using
> > > tempest-lib.
> > >
> > > - Douglas Mendiz?bal
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/barbican/tree/functionaltest
> > >
> > >
> > s
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/1/15 2:12 PM, Asha Seshagiri wrote:
> > >> Hi All ,
> > >
> > >> Has anyone done the Tempest tests for Barbican API Any help
> > >> would be highly appreciated.
> > >
> > >> -- /Thanks and Regards,/ /Asha Seshagiri/
> > >
> > >
> > > -- /Thanks and Regards,/ /Asha Seshagiri/
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
*Thanks and Regards,*
*Asha Seshagiri*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150703/ff721969/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list