[openstack-dev] [api][nova] Openstack HTTP error codes

Roman Podoliaka rpodolyaka at mirantis.com
Thu Jan 29 17:11:56 UTC 2015


Hi Anne,

I think Eugeniya refers to a problem, that we can't really distinguish
between two different  badRequest (400) errors (e.g. wrong security
group name vs wrong key pair name when starting an instance), unless
we parse the error description, which might be error prone.

Thanks,
Roman

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 6:46 PM, Anne Gentle
<annegentle at justwriteclick.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Eugeniya Kudryashova
> <ekudryashova at mirantis.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, all
>>
>>
>> Openstack APIs interact with each other and external systems partially by
>> passing of HTTP errors. The only valuable difference between types of
>> exceptions is HTTP-codes, but current codes are generalized, so external
>> system can’t distinguish what actually happened.
>>
>>
>> As an example two different failures below differs only by error message:
>>
>>
>> request:
>>
>> POST /v2/790f5693e97a40d38c4d5bfdc45acb09/servers HTTP/1.1
>>
>> Host: 192.168.122.195:8774
>>
>> X-Auth-Project-Id: demo
>>
>> Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, compress
>>
>> Content-Length: 189
>>
>> Accept: application/json
>>
>> User-Agent: python-novaclient
>>
>> X-Auth-Token: 2cfeb9283d784cfba694f3122ef413bf
>>
>> Content-Type: application/json
>>
>>
>> {"server": {"name": "demo", "imageRef":
>> "171c9d7d-3912-4547-b2a5-ea157eb08622", "key_name": "test", "flavorRef":
>> "42", "max_count": 1, "min_count": 1, "security_groups": [{"name": "bar"}]}}
>>
>> response:
>>
>>     HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
>>
>> Content-Length: 118
>>
>> Content-Type: application/json; charset=UTF-8
>>
>> X-Compute-Request-Id: req-a995e1fc-7ea4-4305-a7ae-c569169936c0
>>
>> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:43:33 GMT
>>
>>
>> {"badRequest": {"message": "Security group bar not found for project
>> 790f5693e97a40d38c4d5bfdc45acb09.", "code": 400}}
>>
>>
>> and
>>
>>
>> request:
>>
>> POST /v2/790f5693e97a40d38c4d5bfdc45acb09/servers HTTP/1.1
>>
>> Host: 192.168.122.195:8774
>>
>> X-Auth-Project-Id: demo
>>
>> Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, compress
>>
>> Content-Length: 192
>>
>> Accept: application/json
>>
>> User-Agent: python-novaclient
>>
>> X-Auth-Token: 24c0d30ff76c42e0ae160fa93db8cf71
>>
>> Content-Type: application/json
>>
>>
>> {"server": {"name": "demo", "imageRef":
>> "171c9d7d-3912-4547-b2a5-ea157eb08622", "key_name": "foo", "flavorRef":
>> "42", "max_count": 1, "min_count": 1, "security_groups": [{"name":
>> "default"}]}}
>>
>> response:
>>
>> HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
>>
>> Content-Length: 70
>>
>> Content-Type: application/json; charset=UTF-8
>>
>> X-Compute-Request-Id: req-87604089-7071-40a7-a34b-7bc56d0551f5
>>
>> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:39:43 GMT
>>
>>
>> {"badRequest": {"message": "Invalid key_name provided.", "code": 400}}
>>
>>
>> The former specifies an incorrect security group name, and the latter an
>> incorrect keypair name. And the problem is, that just looking at the
>> response body and HTTP response code an external system can’t understand
>> what exactly went wrong. And parsing of error messages here is not the way
>> we’d like to solve this problem.
>
>
> For the Compute API v 2 we have the shortened Error Code in the
> documentation at
> http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-compute-v2.html#compute_server-addresses
>
> such as:
>
> Error response codes
> computeFault (400, 500, …), serviceUnavailable (503), badRequest (400),
> unauthorized (401), forbidden (403), badMethod (405), overLimit (413),
> itemNotFound (404), buildInProgress (409)
>
> Thanks to a recent update (well, last fall) to our build tool for docs.
>
> What we don't have is a table in the docs saying "computeFault has this
> longer Description" -- is that what you are asking for, for all OpenStack
> APIs?
>
> Tell me more.
>
> Anne
>
>
>>
>>
>> Another example for solving this problem is AWS EC2 exception codes [1]
>>
>>
>> So if we have some service based on Openstack projects it would be useful
>> to have some concrete error codes(textual or numeric), which could allow to
>> define what actually goes wrong and later correctly process obtained
>> exception. These codes should be predefined for each exception, have
>> documented structure and allow to parse exception correctly in each step of
>> exception handling.
>>
>>
>> So I’d like to discuss implementing such codes and its usage in openstack
>> projects.
>>
>>
>> [1] -
>> http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/APIReference/errors-overview.html
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Anne Gentle
> annegentle at justwriteclick.com
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list