Open Stack

On 01/29/2015 07:17 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org
> <mailto:thierry at openstack.org>> wrote:
> 
>     Everett Toews wrote:
>     > A couple of important topics came up as a result of attending the
>     > Cross Project Meeting. I’ve added both to the agenda for the next
>     > meeting on Thursday 2015/01/29 at 16:00 UTC.
>     >
>     > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/API-WG#Agenda
>     >
>     > The first is the suggestion from ttx to consider using
>     > openstack-specs [1] for the API guidelines.
> 
>     Precision: my suggestion was to keep the api-wg repository for the
>     various drafting stages, and move to openstack-specs when it's ready to
>     be "recommended" and request wider community comments. Think Draft and
>     RFC stages in the IETF process :)
> 
> 
> Oh, thanks for clarifying, I hadn't understood it that way. 
> 
> To me, it seems more efficient to get votes and iterate in one repo
> rather than going through two iterations and two review groups. What do
> others think?
> Thanks,
> Anne

Honestly, I'm more a fan of the one repository approach. Jumping
repositories means the history gets lost, and you have to restart a
bunch of conversations. That happened in the logging jump from nova ->
openstack-specs, which probably created 3 - 4 months additional delay in
the process.

	-Sean

-- 
Sean Dague
http://dague.net

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 465 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150129/1c16ef3c/attachment.pgp>