Open Stack

On 1/15/2015 9:29 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>
>
> On 12/16/2014 2:48 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/11/2014 10:36 AM, Jon Bernard wrote:
>>> Heya, quick Ceph CI status update.  Once the test_volume_boot_pattern
>>> was marked as skipped, only the revert_resize test was failing.  I have
>>> submitted a patch to nova for this [1], and that yields an all green
>>> ceph ci run [2].  So at the moment, and with my revert patch, we're in
>>> good shape.
>>>
>>> I will fix up that patch today so that it can be properly reviewed and
>>> hopefully merged.  From there I'll submit a patch to infra to move the
>>> job to the check queue as non-voting, and we can go from there.
>>>
>>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139693/
>>> [2]
>>> http://logs.openstack.org/93/139693/1/experimental/check-tempest-dsvm-full-ceph/12397fd/console.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>
>> Jon,
>>
>> Thanks, this is something I'm supposed to be tracking actually given the
>> Kilo priorities for the project, it's nice to know that someone is
>> already fixing this stuff. :)
>>
>> I've reviewed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139693/ so it's close,
>> just needs a small fix.
>>
>
> With Jon's fix [1] the ceph job on the experimental queue is passing now
> [2].
>
> This is great to see.
>
> I think there are still some skipped tests due to known bugs but those
> can be worked out now that we have a baseline.
>
> I'd also like to move forward on getting this into the check queue, but
> remain non-voting for the time being until it's burned in a bit (to make
> sure there aren't any bad intermittent failures lurking in there).
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139693/
> [2]
> http://logs.openstack.org/93/139693/9/experimental/check-tempest-dsvm-full-ceph/e97ba57/console.html
>
>

FYI to anyone paying attention, the ceph job is now running as 
non-voting on the check queue for nova and cinder.

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147559/

-- 

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann