[openstack-dev] [oslo] Why are we continuing to add new namespaced oslo libs?

Louis Taylor kragniz at gmail.com
Sat Jan 24 00:58:16 UTC 2015

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 01:48:32AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> I've just noticed that oslo.log made it to global-requirements.txt 9
> days ago. How come are we still adding some name.spaced oslo libs?
> Wasn't the outcome of the discussion in Paris that we shouldn't do that
> anymore, and that we should be using oslo-log instead of oslo.log?
> Is three something that I am missing here?

The decision at paris was to maintain the same naming convention so the oslo
packages are consistent, since dhellman didn't want to rename a lot of packages.

[1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-November/050313.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150124/a5060a56/attachment.pgp>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list