[openstack-dev] [neutron] Changes to the core team

Joshua Zhang joshua.zhang at canonical.com
Tue Jan 20 05:15:41 UTC 2015


+1

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Aaron Rosen <aaronorosen at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Carl Baldwin <carl at ecbaldwin.net> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Kyle Mestery <mestery at mestery.com>
>> wrote:
>> > The last time we looked at core reviewer stats was in December [1]. In
>> > looking at the current stats, I'm going to propose some changes to the
>> core
>> > team. Reviews are the most important part of being a core reviewer, so
>> we
>> > need to ensure cores are doing reviews. The stats for the 90 day period
>> [2]
>> > indicate some changes are needed for core reviewers who are no longer
>> > reviewing on pace with the other core reviewers.
>> >
>> > First of all, I'm removing Sumit Naiksatam from neutron-core. Sumit has
>> been
>> > a core reviewer for a long time, and his past contributions are very
>> much
>> > thanked by the entire OpenStack Neutron team. If Sumit jumps back in
>> with
>> > thoughtful reviews in the future, we can look at getting him back as a
>> > Neutron core reviewer. But for now, his stats indicate he's not
>> reviewing at
>> > a level consistent with the rest of the Neutron core reviewers.
>> >
>> > As part of the change, I'd like to propose Doug Wiegley as a new Neutron
>> > core reviewer. Doug has been actively reviewing code across not only
>> all the
>> > Neutron projects, but also other projects such as infra. His help and
>> work
>> > in the services split in December were the reason we were so successful
>> in
>> > making that happen. Doug has also been instrumental in the Neutron
>> LBaaS V2
>> > rollout, as well as helping to merge code in the other neutron service
>> > repositories.
>> >
>> > I'd also like to take this time to remind everyone that reviewing code
>> is a
>> > responsibility, in Neutron the same as other projects. And core
>> reviewers
>> > are especially beholden to this responsibility. I'd also like to point
>> out
>> > that +1/-1 reviews are very useful, and I encourage everyone to continue
>> > reviewing code even if you are not a core reviewer.
>> >
>> > Existing neutron cores, please vote +1/-1 for the addition of Doug to
>> the
>> > core team.
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> > Kyle
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-December/051986.html
>> > [2] http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/neutron-reviewers-90.txt
>> >
>> >
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> > Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>> >
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Best Regards
Zhang Hua(张华)
Software Engineer | Canonical
IRC:  zhhuabj
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150120/1f94bc55/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list