Open Stack

In about 24 hours we've seen 9 core +1's, one non-core +1, and only one
dissenting opinion from James himself which I think we have properly
dismissed. With my nomination counting as an additional +1, that is 10,
which is 50% of the 20 cores active the last 90 days.

I believe this vote has carried. Please welcome James Polley to the
TripleO core reviewer team. :)

Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-01-14 10:14:45 -0800:
> Hello! It has been a while since we expanded our review team. The
> numbers aren't easy to read with recent dips caused by the summit and
> holidays. However, I believe James has demonstrated superb review skills
> and a commitment to the project that shows broad awareness of the
> project.
> 
> Below are the results of a meta-review I did, selecting recent reviews
> by James with comments and a final score. I didn't find any reviews by
> James that I objected to.
> 
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/133554/ -- Took charge and provided
> valuable feedback. +2
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114360/ -- Good -1 asking for better
> commit message and then timely follow-up +1 with positive comments for
> more improvement. +2
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/138947/ -- Simpler review, +1'd on Dec.
> 19 and no follow-up since. Allowing 2 weeks for holiday vacation, this
> is only really about 7 - 10 working days and acceptable. +2
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146731/ -- Very thoughtful -1 review of
> recent change with alternatives to the approach submitted as patches.
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139876/ -- Simpler review, +1'd in
> agreement with everyone else. +1
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/142621/ -- Thoughtful +1 with
> consideration for other reviewers. +2
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/113983/ -- Thorough spec review with
> grammar pedantry noted as something that would not prevent a positive
> review score. +2
> 
> All current tripleo-core members are invited to vote at this time. Thank
> you!