Open Stack

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 07:39:59AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 01/14/2015 04:08 AM, Dr. Jens Rosenboom wrote:
> > Am 14/01/15 um 05:17 schrieb Adam Gandelman:
> >> So eventlet 0.16.x has started hitting slaves and breaking stable
> >> branches
> >> (its not like we weren't warned :\ )
> >>
> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1410626
> >>
> >> Should hopefully be resolved by eventlet versions caps in icehouse +
> >> juno's
> >> requirements:
> >>
> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I4bbbeb5bf9c22ed36f5c9a74fec6b487d2c15697,n,z
> >>
> > 
> > It was discussed already in the context of
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1407685 that capping eventlet would
> > not be the proper solution, instead there is a fix already in master
> > which has backports to icehouse + juno pending:
> > 
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/145955/
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146096/
> > 
> > Or is this new bug triggered by a different piece of code relating to
> > the newly released eventlet 0.16.1?
> 
> Capping in stable/* is fine. A real openstack installation will not
> randomly rev all the dependent libraries to a latest version. Assuming
> that they will do so is misguided at best.
> 
> There was real concern in getting master to work correctly, which was
> done. But for stable, capping is the right answer.

The patch that went into master is pretty trivial really. I don't see a
reason to not just copy that into stable too.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|