Open Stack

Sean,


I definitely like the direction that gabbi seems to be headed. It feels
> like a much cleaner version of what nova tried to do with API samples.
> As long as multiple projects think this is an interesting direction, I
> think it's probably fine to add it to global-requirements and let them
> start working with it.



+1 more testing better code.

Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Sean Dague <sean at dague.net> wrote:

> On 01/12/2015 03:11 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> > Thanks for this Chris, I'm hoping to get my fingers dirty with it Real
> > Soon Now.
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Eoghan Glynn <eglynn at redhat.com
> > <mailto:eglynn at redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     I'd be interested in hearing the api-wg viewpoint, specifically
> whether
> >     that working group intends to recommend any best practices around the
> >     approach to API testing.
> >
> >
> > Testing recommendations haven't been part of the conversation yet, but I
> > think it is within scope for the WG to have some opinions on REST API
> > design and validation tools.
>
> I definitely like the direction that gabbi seems to be headed. It feels
> like a much cleaner version of what nova tried to do with API samples.
>
> As long as multiple projects think this is an interesting direction, I
> think it's probably fine to add it to global-requirements and let them
> start working with it.
>
>         -Sean
>
> --
> Sean Dague
> http://dague.net
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150113/94251bb9/attachment.html>