Open Stack

Hi,

Puppet OpenStack community uses Beaker for acceptance testing. I would
consider it as option [2]

[2] https://github.com/puppetlabs/beaker

--
Best regards,
Sergii Golovatiuk,
Skype #golserge
IRC #holser

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya <bdobrelia at mirantis.com>
wrote:

> Hello.
>
> We are working on the modularization of Openstack deployment by puppet
> manifests in Fuel library [0].
>
> Each deploy step should be post-verified with some testing framework as
> well.
>
> I believe the framework should:
> * be shipped as a part of Fuel library for puppet manifests instead of
> orchestration or Nailgun backend logic;
> * allow the deployer to verify results right in-place, at the node being
> deployed, for example, with a rake tool;
> * be compatible / easy to integrate with the existing orchestration in
> Fuel and Mistral as an option?
>
> It looks like test resources provided by Serverspec [1] are a good
> option, what do you think?
>
> What plans have Fuel Nailgun team for testing the results of deploy
> steps aka tasks? The spec for blueprint gives no a clear answer.
>
> [0]
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/fuel-library-modularization
> [1] http://serverspec.org/resource_types.html
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Bogdan Dobrelya,
> Skype #bogdando_at_yahoo.com
> Irc #bogdando
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150112/b2b0702a/attachment.html>