Open Stack

Hi guys,

Thanks for answering my questions. I have 2 points:

1 - This (remove drivers without CI) is a way impacting change to be
implemented without exhausting notification and discussion on the mailing
list. I myself was in the meeting but this decision wasn't crystal clear.
There must be other driver maintainers completely unaware of this.

2 - Build a CI infrastructure and have people to maintain a the CI for a
new driver in a 5 weeks frame. Not all companies has the knowledge and
resources necessary to this in such sort period. We should consider a grace
release period, i.e. drivers entering on K, have until L to implement
theirs CIs.

On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 4:07 AM, Asselin, Ramy <ramy.asselin at hp.com> wrote:

> Feel free to join any of the 3rd party 'mentoring' meetings on IRC
> Freenode #openstack-meeting to help get started, work through issues, etc.
>
> "Third Party meeting for all aspects of Third Party needs: Mondays at 1500
> UTC and Tuesdays at 0800 UTC. Everyone interested in any aspect Third Party
> process is encouraged to attend." [1]
>
> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty
>
> Ramy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Perez [mailto:thingee at gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2015 6:53 PM
> To: jsbryant at electronicjungle.net; OpenStack Development Mailing List
> (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Cutoff deadlines for cinder drivers
>
> On 21:00 Sat 10 Jan     , Jay S. Bryant wrote:
> > I think what we discussed was that existing drivers were supposed to
> > have something working by the end of k-2, or at least have something
> > close to working.
> >
> > For new drivers they had to have 3rd party CI working by the end of Kilo.
> >
> > Duncan, correct me if I am wrong.
> >
> > Jay
> > On 01/10/2015 04:52 PM, Mike Perez wrote:
> > >On 14:42 Fri 09 Jan     , Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
> > >>Hi Erlon,
> > >>
> > >>We've got a thread mailing-list [1] for it and some details in wiki
> [2].
> > >>Anyway, need to get confirmation from our core devs and/or Mike.
> > >>
> > >>[1]
> > >>http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-October/0495
> > >>12.html
> > >>[2]
> > >>https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#Testi
> > >>ng_requirements_for_Kilo_release_and_beyond
> > >>
> > >>Regards,
> > >>Ivan Kolodyazhny
> > >>
> > >>On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Erlon Cruz <sombrafam at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>Hi all, hi cinder core devs,
> > >>>
> > >>>I have read on IRC discussions about a deadline for drivers vendors
> > >>>to have their CI running and voting until kilo-2, but I didn't find
> > >>>any post on this list to confirm this. Can anyone confirm this?
> > >>>
> > >>>Thanks,
> > >>>Erlon
> > >We did discuss and agree in the Cinder meeting that the deadline
> > >would be k-2, but I don't think anyone reached out to the driver
> > >maintainers about the deadline. Duncan had this action item [1],
> perhaps he can speak more about it.
> > >
> > >[1] -
> > >http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2014/cinder.2014-11-19
> > >-16.00.html
> > >
>
> That is correct [1]. However, I don't think there was any warning given to
> existing drivers [2]. If Duncan can confirm this is the case, I would
> recommend fair warning go out for the end of Kilo for existing drivers as
> well.
>
> [1] -
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#Deadlines
> [2] -
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2014/cinder.2014-11-19-16.00.html
>
> --
> Mike Perez
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150112/bae1ca42/attachment.html>