I've got no strong preferences on which we go for, but agree they should be consistent. The internal python library options should also be consistent. On 5 January 2015 at 20:52, Mike Perez <thingee at gmail.com> wrote: > On 09:13 Mon 05 Jan , Steven Kaufer wrote: > > Giving that each of these 3 clients will be supporting client-side > sorting > > in kilo, it seems that we should get this implemented in a consistent > > manner. It seems that the 2 options are either: > > > > --sort-key key1 --sort-dir desc --sort-key key2 --sort-dir asc > > --sort key1:asc,key2:desc > > > > Personally, I favor option 2 but IMO it is more important that these are > > made consistent. > > I like option 2 better. > > -- > Mike Perez > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Duncan Thomas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150106/4d4e650a/attachment.html>