Open Stack

On 1/5/2015 6:07 PM, Joe Cropper wrote:
> Prefixing subject with [nova] so folks’ mail rules catch this.
>
> - Joe
>
>> On Jan 5, 2015, at 1:47 PM, Kenneth Burger <burgerk at us.ibm.com
>> <mailto:burgerk at us.ibm.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, I am trying to get approval on this nova blueprint,
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/140133/.   There was a +2 from
>> Michael Still ( twice in prior patches ) and a +1 from Jay Bryant from
>> a cinder perspective.    The only changes from the patches receiving
>> the +2  was related to a directory change of the spec location in the
>> repository.
>>
>> Is it still possible to get approval for this blueprint?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ken Burger
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

A single +2 does not an approval make, but I don't know if there were 
others lined up to approve this before the change and the 12/18 deadline.

We're at a point now where the nova-drivers team is going to get 
together this week (if not before the nova meeting on Thursday, during 
that meeting) to talk about a exception process plan for k-2.  Details 
on the outcome of that should be in the ML once determined.

-- 

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann