Open Stack

On 02/24/2015 01:28 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:54:31AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +0000, Chris Dent wrote:
>>> On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>
>>>> need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think this is a blocker,
>>>> it is just a sign that the project needs to focus on providing more resources
>>>> to the teams impacted in that way.
>>>
>>> What are the mechanisms whereby the project provides more resources
>>> to teams?
> 
> Along with the below, if push comes to shove, OpenStack Foundation could
> probably try a milder variant (obviously, not all activities can be
> categorized as 'critical path') of Linux Foundation's "Critical
> Infrastructure Protection Initiative"[1] to fund certain project
> activities in need.

The OpenStack Foundation effectively already does this.  In particular,
the Foundation is helping fund critical horizontal efforts like release
management, infrastructure, and community management.

-- 
Russell Bryant