[openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

Daniel P. Berrange berrange at redhat.com
Tue Feb 24 11:54:31 UTC 2015


On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +0000, Chris Dent wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> 
> >need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think this is a blocker,
> >it is just a sign that the project needs to focus on providing more resources
> >to the teams impacted in that way.
> 
> What are the mechanisms whereby the project provides more resources
> to teams?

The technical committee and / or foundation board can highlight the need
for investment of resources in critical areas of the project, to either
the community members or vendors involved. As an example, this was done
successfully recently to increase involvement in maintaining the EC2
API support.  There are plenty of vendors involved in OpenStack which
have the ability to target resources, if they can learn where those
resources are best spent.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list