On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:24:01PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > Here's another thought: is the big-bang integrated 6-month fixed release > cycle useful any more? Can we talk about using more of a moving train model > that doesn't have these long freeze cycles? At least for some of the > projects, I think that would ease some of the minds of folks who are > dismayed at having to wait yet another 6-9 months to see their code in the > Nova release. I entirely agree - the 6 month cycle creates massive pain for contributors who think openstack is supposed to be a fast moving agile project. I have co-incidentally just proposed we switch to a 2 month cycle, since we pretty much have everything in place to achieve that with little fuss, since we already do 3 milestone releases during that 6 month cycle. http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-February/057614.html Lets continue discussion in the separate thread, as many people probably ignore this thread due to its [nova] tag and subject Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|