Open Stack

----- Original Message -----
> Has there been any work to use conntrack synchronization similar to L3 HA in
> DVR so failover is fast on the SNAT node?
> 

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139686/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/143169/

These changes have taken a back seat to improving the DVR job reliability
and L3 agent refactoring. Michael and Rajeev could expand.

> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Carl Baldwin < carl at ecbaldwin.net > wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Feb 10, 2015 2:36 AM, "Wilence Yao" < wilence.yao at gmail.com > wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > After OpenStack Juno, floating ip is handled by dvr, but SNAT is still
> > handled by l3agent on network node. The distributed SNAT is in future
> > plans for DVR. In my opinion, SNAT can move to DVR as well as floating ip.
> > I have searched in blueprint, there is little about distributed SNAT. Is
> > there any different between distributed floating ip and distributed SNAT?
> 
> The difference is that a shared snat address is shared among instances on
> multiple compute nodes. A floating ip is exclusive to a single instance on
> one compute node. I'm interested to hear your ideas for distributing it.
> 
> Carl
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Kevin Benton
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>